Open
Conversation
Member
|
@dakejahl I've always disliked the covariance matrices, but there is a significant cost to changing to Fix3 as we'd need to send both for many years, and we'd pay a flash cost of supporting both. The convention of mapping the covariance to length 6 and extracting the 3 ac curacies from that does work well, even though it is ugly |
Contributor
Author
|
@tridge Understood. The primary motivation is quality metrics. Would you be open to another auxiliary gnss message for noise, jamming, differential corrections age, etc? |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A practical GNSS message for PX4 and Ardupilot